Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Some planned cleanups of the 802.11 dissector

From: Simon Barber <simon.barber@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:56:18 -0700
great idea. I'll wait for your changes before adding a feature - I'd like to be able to filter out beacons by writing wlan.beacon, probes by wlan.probe_request, etc.

Simon

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,

I plan to do some cleanups to
- somewhat improve the readability of the code
  1) Get rid of reduntant author entries and code comments, see
     https://code.wireshark.org/review/16154
  2) Get rid of those fixed field functions that only add one of two items.
     Call the remaining functions directly (without the indirection of
     add_fixed_field()).
- make the use of filters more straight forward: We currently register the
  following top level filters within the file:
  wlan_aggregate
  wlan
  wlan_mgt
  wlan_rsna_eapol
  I'd like to merge at least wlan_mgt into wlan. I don't see the gain in the
  separation and it definitely confuses me:
  a) wlan_mgt is not only managemnt frames but also control frames while
     data frames are just wlan.
  b) The addresses inside wlan_mgt frames are addressed via wlan.xxx

Let me know what you think about these things.

Thanks
   Jörg

--
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe