On 18-03-2016 23:00, Pascal Quantin wrote:
Le 18 mars 2016 10:02 PM, "João Valverde"
<joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> a écrit :
>
> I pushed a change removing ADNS support. If anyone depends on this:
>
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/14519/
>
By curiosity, is ADNS support an issue?
500 hundred less lines of useless bit-rotting code to maintain. ADNS
upstream seems dead and c-ares is superior in every respect.
I should also note that ADNS is GPLv3+, so not suitable for Wireshark.
