Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
From: Anil <anilkumar911@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:58:15 +0530
Pascal --
Thanks for the response. I tired various things. On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2015-03-15 14:16 GMT+01:00 Anil <anilkumar911@xxxxxxxxx>:I get the below errorHi --I have been seeing this problem with the wireshark since 12 Mar 2015.
anil@anilpc:~/ws_srcpkg/build$ ./run/wireshark-gtk
18:26:50 Err Field 'Src Vm Name' (nstrace.src_vm) is an integral value (FT_INT64) but is being displayed as BASE_NONE
Trace/breakpoint trapI can see that enum (enum ftenum) values are different in different files (frames) as seen from GDB.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff6593c13 in g_logv () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#1 0x00007ffff6593d72 in g_log () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x00007ffff306df34 in tmp_fld_check_assert (hfinfo=0x7fffe4867698 <hf+88>, hfinfo@entry=0x22e3b)
at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5751
#3 proto_register_field_init (hfinfo=hfinfo@entry=0x7fffe4867698 <hf+88>, parent=parent@entry=142907)
at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5924
#4 0x00007ffff306e1c9 in proto_register_field_common (proto=proto@entry=0x8694a0, hfi=hfi@entry=0x7fffe4867698 <hf+88>,
parent=parent@entry=142907) at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5402
#5 0x00007ffff30751e1 in proto_register_field_array (parent=142907, hf=hf@entry=0x7fffe4867640 <hf>,
num_records=num_records@entry=28) at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:5431
#6 0x00007fffe4666447 in proto_register_ns () at packet-nstrace.c:496
#7 0x00007ffff65a96b8 in g_slist_foreach () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 0x00007ffff30750d2 in proto_init (
register_all_protocols_func=register_all_protocols_func@entry=0x422910 <register_all_protocols@plt>,
register_all_handoffs_func=register_all_handoffs_func@entry=0x41f910 <register_all_protocol_handoffs@plt>,
cb=cb@entry=0x4b3290 <splash_update>, client_data=client_data@entry=0x9ce360)
at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/proto.c:497
#9 0x00007ffff30550bb in epan_init (register_all_protocols_func=0x422910 <register_all_protocols@plt>,
register_all_handoffs_func=0x41f910 <register_all_protocol_handoffs@plt>, cb=0x4b3290 <splash_update>,
client_data=client_data@entry=0x9ce360) at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/epan/epan.c:116
#10 0x0000000000423726 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdf58) at /home/anil/ws_srcpkg/wireshark-1.99.3/ui/gtk/main.c:2511
(gdb) p (int) FT_STRINGZ
$1 = 24
(gdb) frame 6
#6 0x00007fffe4666447 in proto_register_ns () at packet-nstrace.c:496
496 packet-nstrace.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) p (int) FT_STRINGZ
$2 = 18Hi Anil,it's probably time for you to clean and rebuild as you have some objects that use an old ftenum (the dependency check probably get confused at some point and did not recompile all the files adter the ftypes.h update for FT_(U)INT_(40|48|56) addition).Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- From: Graham Bloice
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- From: Anil
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- From: Pascal Quantin
- [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] My recent build of Wireshark from the master branch consumes 99-100% of the CPU
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Latest code broken?
- Index(es):
- Get Wireshark
- Download
- Code of Conduct