ok thanks. will do that then.
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx
>Data: 25-feb-2015 22.33
>A: <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Ogg: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Protocol Export objects - New Dissector Development
>
>Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@...> writes:
>
>> > Are there any simple protocols which need a dissector to be added to
>> > Whireshark. I thought of some; but all of them seem to already supported
>> > in Wireshark.
>> >
>> > Are there any protocol you can suggest? I would like to develop the
>> > dissector for a simple protocol, and then with the acquired experience
>> > maybe try something more complex.
>>
>> Check out the bug database: there are plenty of requests for
>> improvements, enhancements, and new dissectors, including some
>> dissectors that are mostly written but need some cleanup (but the
>> cleanup hasn't happened in so long it's unlikely the original author
>> will do anything with it). (Unfortunately some of those bugs may be
>> closed as LATER.)
>
>You might also be able to pick up some ideas from either the wishlist[1] or
>the GSoC[2] pages.
>
>- Chris
>
>[1]: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Wishlist
>[2]: http://wiki.wireshark.org/GSoC2014
>
>___________________________________________________________________________
>Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
