Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Undissected packet bytes
From: Evan Huus <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 07:19:24 -0500
I believe g_log and friends go to standard out, but maybe not on all
platforms. An expert info under conditional compilation would probably
be enough though, I hadn't thought of that.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dario Lombardo
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I suppose you could add a an expert info, but I think that might be
>> overkill, most users probably don't care that much.
>
>
> Expert infos could be added under conditional compilation. If enabled it
> would allow to filter packets that has expert info set, in order to find out
> incomplete dissectors against a large set of data (eg. menagerie).
>
>>
>> You could just log
>> it, or dissect it as data, or...
>
>
> You mean using g_log, don't you? Where those logs go? I'm not able to show
> them.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe