On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> 2014-11-05 18:31 GMT+01:00 Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2014, at 2:30 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> 2014-11-05 11:12 GMT+01:00 Michal Labedzki <michal.labedzki@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>> Please run "LC_ALL=it_IT wireshark"
>> >>
>> >> Does it work on Windows? I do not remember to know anyone GUI
>> >> application without option to change language by GUI. Do you know how
>> >> to change locale after running application? (QEvent::LocaleChange ?)
>> >> If this is not possible then dynamic change application language will
>> >> be lost.
>> >
>> > +1. Most software I use allow me to manually override the language
>> > without messing with the environment variables.
>>
>> Do you use any GUI applications other than Wireshark?
>
>
> Yes, tons of as I'm on Windows :)
>
>>
>> On what operating system do you use them?
>
>
> See above
>
>>
>>
>> Do they all offer a manual language override, so that you can set a
>> particular application's language independently of your personal "global"
>> language setting?
>
>
> The only ones I can think to supporting multiple languages without a GUI
> option to set it are... command line based coming from Linux world (like
> mercurial) and here I do use the environment variable. But it's more painful
> for a lazy guy and not a common use case for a standard Windows user I
> think.
> Moreover I prefer to have a good interface in English rather than a partial
> / bad French translation :)
>
>>
>>
>> > And here we are talking about a functionality we already have.
>>
>> This is functionality we have in the Qt version, which most people aren't
>> using, and which is still incomplete. I.e., it's functionality we have in a
>> version under development.
>
>
> Agreed, but it's also the first time we introduce language support so it's
> the right time to discuss this kind of thing.
>
>>
>>
>> I do not at all agree with, and will never agree with, the belief that
>> removing existing functionality is inherently wrong. If the functionality
>> is unused, or is rarely used and if its capabilities can be achieved in
>> another way, I consider that a very good reason to consider removing it.
>
>
> I understand your point. On the other point it's really common practice (at
> least on Windows) to allow user to select the language from the GUI.
>
>>
>> > Removing it would be a big loss in my opinion.
>>
>> In what ways is it used that its disappearance would be a big loss rather
>> than, at most, a minor loss?
>
>
> For me: a minor loss as I know the environment variables allowing to
> override it. For the common Windows user, it might be a bigger loss.
>
> Pascal.
Hi,
Like other no English people, i want to have the choose to select the
language on Gui.
For me, it is a not a problem to have a option to choose the language
(there is a lot of option/preference on Wireshark...)
For some software, it is possible to select the language when you
install the software, but no very fan to this option...
Regards,
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
