Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Ping-Bug? (was: master 599b880: Handle the UTC timestamps in
From: Jeff Morriss <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:08:31 -0400
On 07/13/14 14:05, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Gerald Combs <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/7/14 9:10 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Alexis La Goutte
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

     On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Evan Huus <[email protected]

     > It would be nice to have different tags for Refs-Bug and
     Fixes-Bug, and have
     > the bugzilla integration do The Right Thing for changes that refer
     to but do
     > not fix a bug. Gerald, how easy is this? I believe OpenStack has a
     set of
     > tags they use which we might look to for inspiration?
     I like OpenStack tags :

     Closes-Bug: #1234567 -- use 'Closes-Bug' if the commit is intended
     fully fix and close the bug being referenced.
     Partial-Bug: #1234567 -- use 'Partial-Bug' if the commit is only a
     partial fix and more work is needed.
     Related-Bug: #1234567 -- use 'Related-Bug' if the commit is merely
     related to the referenced bug.

How would Partial-Bug and Related-Bug differ for our purposes? Wouldn't
they do the same thing (i.e. add a comment to the bug)? Could we get
away with two tags:

Ping-Bug: 12345 -- Add a comment to bug 12345
Bug (or Closes-Bug): 12345 -- Add a comment and mark it RESOLVED FIXED.

Just "Ping-Bug" and "Bug" works for me.
(or Comment-Bug and Closes-Bug ?)
So what are the current set of tags for this?  I tried using Ping-Bug 
(on change 3314) and it ended up closing the bug on me...