Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BItfields Larger than 32 Bits
From: Jakub Zawadzki <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:26:21 +0200

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:19:51PM -0400, Kevin Cox wrote:
> I was attempting to dissect a 64 bit bitfield and was wondering what the
> best/preferred method was.  I saw a question on ask.wireshark.org[0]
> which had a single answer the said to use a text field.
> [0]
> http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/20599/dissecting-bitfields-larger-than-32-bits
> I was wondering if there is a better way to do this. 

Could you check proto_tree_add_split_bits_item_ret_val()?
It looks someone had already this problem.