2014-04-14 21:09 GMT+02:00 Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Apr 14, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> If a reviewer thinks the current patch is "a good start" for a feature
>>> (and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay to give the +2?
>>
>> I don't see why not, but he or she should probably check with the
>> submitter first.
>
> So +1 might be better - that way, the submitter can +2 the code if they deem it ready for prime time.
+1, giving +2 and a successful test round may trigger automatic
submitting in the future.
