On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
<hadriel.kaplan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> That patch almost (but not quite) matches what's listed in
>> README.dissector (lines 1018-1024). I believe the README is correct,
>> in which case the patch is simply out of date (I believe it's missing
>> FT_AX25 and FT_VINES, and possibly others I haven't done a thorough
>> check).
>
> Heh, you told me to go read that before and I forgot to check it.
>
> So this then:
> - FT_INT8, FT_INT16, FT_INT24 and FT_INT32
> - FT_UINT8, FT_UINT16, FT_UINT24, FT_UINT32, FT_IPXNET and FT_FRAMENUM
> - FT_UINT64 and FT_EUI64
> - FT_STRING, FT_STRINGZ and FT_UINT_STRING
> - FT_FLOAT and FT_DOUBLE
> - FT_BYTES, FT_UINT_BYTES, FT_AX25, FT_ETHER, FT_VINES, FT_OID and FT_REL_OID
> - FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME and FT_RELATIVE_TIME
As far as I know without digging through the code in epan/ftypes/ to be sure.
