Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 54983: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/:

Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 54983: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trun

From: Bill Meier <wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:48:51 -0500

On 1/27/2014 12:23 PM, Evan Huus wrote:

We should maybe make tshark -G values part of the test suite? (and
maybe the other tshark -G dumps as well?)


Certainly 'tshark -G values' should be added.
(I'll do so).

A quick look suggests that crashes in most (all ?) of the other -G dumpswould probably not occur because of bad dissector code.


Bill

References:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 54983: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-bgp.c
  - From: Evan Huus

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 54983: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-bgp.c
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Python bindings for wireshark
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 54983: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-bgp.c
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Reminder: Subversion to Git migration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube