On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:20:09PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9607
>
> Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> URL| |http://www.wireshark.org/li
> | |sts/wireshark-dev/201306/ms
> | |g00101.html
>
> --- Comment #1 from Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Mailing list comments on the subject of FileShark for reference:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00101.html (start of
> thread, also shown in URL field above. Using this as my main source of
> direction)
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00102.html
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201306/msg00104.html
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201307/msg00002.html (looks like
> we need a new name...)
No, I don't think so. They are the copycats, not us. Our product is still
called Wireshark and if we install a binary that is called fileshark then
there should not be a problem about it.
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
