Thus wrote Martin Kaiser (lists@xxxxxxxxx):
> Thus wrote Jakub Zawadzki (darkjames-ws@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > proto_item_fill_label() allows empty bytes:
> > 5389 case FT_BYTES:
> > 5390 case FT_UINT_BYTES:
> > 5391 bytes = (guint8 *)fvalue_get(&fi->value);
> > 5392 label_fill(label_str, 0, hfinfo,
> > 5393 (bytes) ? bytes_to_str(bytes, fvalue_length(&fi->value)) : "<MISSING>");
> > 5394 break;
> > It'd be good to make them consistent, allow empty bytes (+1 from me) or assert in both place.
> ok, I'll change this.
done in r54290.
