On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:01:52AM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Thus wrote Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
>
>
> > On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:09 PM, jmayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53619
>
> > > User: jmayer
> > > Date: 2013/11/27 11:09 PM
>
> > > Log:
> > > Having a generated file in the source tree is not fun.
>
> > Should we add a top-level rule to make it, and remove it from SVN?
>
> +1
>
> Last time I added a protocol and modified release-notes.asciidoc, I
> couldn't figure out if/how I should update NEWS.
cmake:
cd docbook
make release_notes
autotools:
cd docbook
make release_notes
OK, so they are identical. Main "problem" are the required tools, but
developers should be able to live with reading
docbook/release-notes.asciidoc instead of NEWS.
How about removing the NEWS file and "just" making sure that it is
generated for packaging?
Once that is done we can move to the asn1/ stuff - which should then be
moved to epan/dissectors/asn1/ ;-)
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
