Hi,
>Anders, this may be related to your recent TVB optimizations, since I don't think it happened before that? Did you change the behaviour of >tvb_find_line_end or its callees at all?
Not intentionally ;-)
I just expanded some code inside the function and used tvb_pbrk_guint8_within_tvb() to avoid a repeated call to check_offset_length()
But I may have missed something...
Regards
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of eapache@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: den 21 oktober 2013 15:07
To: wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 52730: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-cdp.c
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=52730
User: eapache
Date: 2013/10/21 01:07 PM
Log:
Don't go into a loop if we find a zero-length line. Fixes
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9312
Anders, this may be related to your recent TVB optimizations, since I don't think it happened before that? Did you change the behaviour of tvb_find_line_end or its callees at all?
Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
Changes Path Action
+1 -0 packet-cdp.c Modified
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
