On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Réczey Bálint <rbalint@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> FreeBSD has a different implementation AFAIK
The first implementation was the WinPcap one, for x86-32 or IA-32 or whatever you want to call the 32-bit version of x86.
The FreeBSD people picked that one up, added x86-64 support, and, if I remember, didn't bother to cite the WinPcap folks (Loris Degioanni was a bit annoyed at that, as I remember).
Both have BSDish licenses, which probably got in the way of adopting them for Linux, so I suspect the Linux implementation is independent (just as its implementation of the BPF interpreter is different).
> and covers fewer architectures.
Linux's JIT also handles PPC, although, as POWER/PowerPC/Power ISA has fixed-length instructions, it's apparently not vulnerable to the attack mentioned in the post Jakub cited. If they decided to support S/3x0-64^Wz/Architecture, that *would* be vulnerable (as would 68k and VAX, among others).
