Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Proposed Gerrit workflow (was: Re: Notes from Sharkfest '13)
From: Jeff Morriss <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:21:10 -0400
On 06/22/13 06:47, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi All,

2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin <[email protected]>:
Hash: SHA256

On 06/20/2013 04:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin <[email protected]>

On 06/20/2013 02:17 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:

Advantates: - I'm not sure that an in-house equivalent (e.g. Gerrit
plus a private repository) would be better than what Github offers.
Yes, Gerrit is better than github:
Presumably you mean "Gerrit plus a private repository is better than
github", as Gerrit, as far as I can tell, is just software that works with
a Git repository.
Yes, although managing repositories being what Gerrit do, Gerrit without a
least one repository would be a very boring application.

I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
Please check it and share your opinion.
It would probably be good to include how/where patch submitters would 
attach other attachments (e.g., sample captures) that go along with 
their patch (I spent a little time going through the Gerrit docs and 
didn't find anything like that).  (A large portion of the patches we 
accept need to have a corresponding test capture file before anyone will 
accept it.)