Thus wrote B�lint R�czey (balint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
> to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
> Please check it and share your opinion.
would that mean that even the most basic change needs peer review and
approval based on the process defined by gerrit?
I'm a bit worried that this doubles the time for such simple changes. I
often see this in corporate environments where people don't correct
typos, misleading variable names, formatting etc. because they can't be
bothered with the administrative overhead.
Regards,
Martin
