Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] epan/dissectors/dcerpc/idl2wrs.c?
From: ronnie sahlberg <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 15:13:15 -0700
I say Delete it.

It is the original proof of concept hack I did before we switched to PIDL.

I abandoned this for PIDL in 2005  and should have deleted it then.



On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is that a functional translator from some flavor of DCE RPC IDL (OSF, Microsoft, Samba PIDL) to a Wireshark dissector?
>
> If the IDL is PIDL, is it better than Samba's translator, inferior to Samba's translator, or none of the above?
>
> Should we be building it with the autotools and with MSVC++, or should we leave it out of the CMake build?  (I see no point in building it with some of those but not others.)
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe