Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 49596: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trun
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:24:21 -0400 (EDT)
Per some of the other discussions, this may not be the best name, but I would like to eventually replace it with the existing expert_add_info_format name, just with the expert info structure as an argument (an no severity, group arguments), so that the "format"ing (printf) functionality is clearer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
To: wireshark-dev <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, May 28, 2013 5:48 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 49596: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-l2tp.c packet-lapd.c packet-ldp.c packet-lisp-data.c packet-lmp.c packet-ltp.c packet-m2pa.c packet-mbtcp.c packet-meta.c packet-miop.c ...

Hello Michael,

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 05:30:45PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=49596
> User: mmann
> Date: 2013/05/27 10:30 AM
> Log:
>  Batch of filterable expert infos

I started to look at "my" dissectors but stopped when I found that most
lines that need changing require printf formatting. Is there a way to handle
that already? Also I couldn't find documentation on this feature.

Joerg Mayer                                           <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe