I dont think composite tvbs actually work. or at least they didnt
work when we originally wrote the reassembly code.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is a tangential issue that has always confused me.
>
> Why do we malloc+memcpy data for reassembly when we already have
> 'virtual' composite TVBs?
>
> Wouldn't it be more efficient (in time and memory) to create a
> composite TVB for each reassembly and then build the reassembled
> packet in it? You would never have to copy or allocate any actual
> packet data...
>
> Or am I misunderstanding how composite TVBs actually work?
>
> Thanks,
> Evan
>
> P.S. Clearly some protocols where the payload is XORed or hashed
> wouldn't be able to do this, but most protocols doing reassembly just
> carry the raw payload bytes.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
