Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values

From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:00:53 +0100

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0100, David Arnold wrote:
> Is there any enthusiasm for a BASE_CUSTOM64?

I'd rather want some generic BASE_CUSTOM which pass to custom functiom fvalue_t (and maybe hf_index).

Jakub.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: Evan Huus

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: David Arnold
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: David Arnold
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: David Arnold
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: Jeff Morriss
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
  - From: David Arnold

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 48555: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: value_string.c
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread