On 11/03/2013, at 2:18 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi Jaap,
> I know it's a synonym, and I know the autotools guys push for it, and I'm all for it, but...
> We have to have an idea what we break, on any of the platforms Wirehark is build for, if we do this.
> So therefore my question how far back this symbiotic existence of INCLUDES and CPPFLAGS goes.
Looks like it was introduced in automake-1.4. Quoting from the NEWS file:
* Added `AM_FOOFLAGS' variable for each compiler invocation;
e.g. AM_CFLAGS can be used in Makefile.am to set C compiler flags
automake-1.5's documentation includes the same statement about INCLUDES being deprecated in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS as the latest docs do.
d
> On 2013-03-11 12:00, David Arnold wrote:
>> On 11/03/2013, at 8:10 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>> Hi Jaap,
>>> ref bug 8452.
>>> When did autotools started to use AM_CPPFLAGS, which are now favorable over
>>> INCLUDE? Do we break anything with this cleanup?
>> (I submitted the bug)
>> The automake documentation says:
>> INCLUDES
>> This does the same job as AM_CPPFLAGS (or any per-target
>> _CPPFLAGS variable if it is used). It is an older name for
>> the same functionality. This variable is deprecated; we
>> suggest using AM_CPPFLAGS and per-target _CPPFLAGS instead.
>> On that basis, I believe they're synonyms, and the automake folks are
>> pushing everyone towards the AM_* style variables.
>> I see the annoying logspew using OSX with MacPorts and
>> automake-1.13.1 (and I *think* on Debian/testing as well, but that box
>> is inaccessible right now, so I cannot confirm that).
>> I've updated the bug,
>> d
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
