On 1/28/2013 4:14 PM, Maynard, Chris wrote:
#2 is fine. The new script seems to run slower though ... but I assume that's because it's doing a much more thorough job?
$ time tools/checkhf.pl epan/dissectors/packet-*.c &> out1.txt
real 0m13.206s
user 0m12.807s
sys 0m0.311s
$ cat out1.txt | wc -l
31821
$ time tools/checkhf-v2.pl epan/dissectors/packet-*.c &> out2.txt
real 1m10.260s
user 1m9.295s
sys 0m0.560s
$ cat out2.txt | wc -l
3014
There's a lot of somewhat complex regex pattern matching going on (which
I didn't spend any time optimizing).
I think it's doing a much better job altho 'thorough' might not be quite
the word to use given the ad-hoc nature of what's going on.
In any case, the time seems acceptable.
Bill
