Le 28/01/2013 21:21, Bill Meier a �crit :
> On 1/28/2013 2:58 PM, wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> Log:
>> Re-implemention of checkhf.pl:
>> Main objective: reduce the number of false positives.
>> Normal usage: the same as for checkhf.pl.
>>
>> For now: named checkhf-v2.pl
>>
>
> I've just committed a re-implementation of checkhf.pl and named it
> checkhf-v2.pl.
>
> I'm not really sure how to handle this type of situation:
>
> 1. Retire (delete) checkhf.pl and then commit new version
> with the same name. (It is a new program).
> (More or less completely hides the original; It's obviously
> still in the repository if you know how to find it).
>
> 2. Just commit the new version as a diff from the previous
> (essentially removing almost all the lines of the old and
> adding the new). (Keeps the history).
>
> 3. Give the re-implementation a different name.
> Keep the old in the repository.
>
> Maybe #2 is the way to go....
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Bill
Hi Bill,
option #2 seems to be the best one for me: this way a svn blame makes it
easier to find the previous version and the user can benefit from the
new enhanced version without changing his habits.
Regards,
Pascal.
