On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 09:28:24AM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:
> I'm starting to think we tightened the scope of ep memory too much. I do
> think that freeing it at the beginning of epan_dissect_run was wrong, but
> I'm starting to wonder if the right place for it isn't in epan_dissect_run
> at all (beginning or end) but is in epan_dissect_cleanup instead. As a
> bonus I believe this may let us get rid of the epan_dissect_run_with_taps
> function?
You've already proposed it once, in my opinion in some scenarios it won't work,
please read my reply: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201210/msg00198.html
Anyway, some memory pool only for single edt initalized in epan_dissect_init(),
and later freed in epan_dissect_cleanup() will work.
Also I proposed other (simpler?) idea: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201210/msg00204.html
But we right now have wmem_ so it'd be better to use wmem interface.
Cheers,
Jakub.
