Am 15.10.2012 20:31, schrieb Gerald Combs:
> On 10/13/12 11:10 AM, Christopher Maynard wrote:
>> Alexander Koeppe <format_c@...> writes:
>>
>>> I just built the latest SVN source and was surprised that all "normal"
>>> TCP ACK packets which are used to be white are now tinted in blue.
>>>
>>> I wonder if this happended unintended?
>>
>> I tested this after compiling SVN 45521 on Windows 7 64-bit with stock coloring
>> rules and the TCP ACK's are colorized normally. When I expand the frame
>> details, the coloring rule name/string listed is TCP/tcp, which corresponds to
>> the foreground/background colors of #000000/#E7E5FF.
>>
>> So, which coloring rule is listed for your frames, and what
>> foreground/background colors correspond to that rule?
>
> I recently updated the default colorfilters using
> http://emilis.info/other/extended_tango/ as a starting point in an
> effort to make them a little less eye-bleed-inducing. I ended up making
> the default TCP background #97c4f0 because it looked good at the time.
> Would a lighter background be preferred?
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
Intentionally I just wanted know if this was intended. I wasn't sure if
something is wrong on my system / dependencies. But after a complete
re-checkout rebuild and deletion of ~/.wireshark/ it remained the same.
Did you change it thorugh a bug?
IMHO a lighter tone would make it easier to look at.
Greetings.
