On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:32:07AM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
> The fix is needed regardless of what else happens - even with the old
> old allocator this was still a bug
> (in the sl_ allocator, if not the ep_ one)
Nah, sl_ allocator don't have this bug.
1. Right now sl_free_all() is never used
2. even if it would be, there's no guard pages so
npc->buf is not shifted, and
npc->amount_free_init has correct size value.
And I'm mainly worried about sl_ allocator, cause with that commit
I added another 12 bytes to emem_chunk_t...
> I land proper sharing of free pages between pools then this path will
> probably stop being hit again (just like before).
>
> I don't want to make promises I can't keep, but I have an idea I'm
> pretty sure will work, and Thursday evening is looking promising for
> time to implement it. I'll make sure to test with both allocation
> schemes this time though!
I still think that https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5284#c26
would also fix the problem, and we just unnecessary overcomplicate allocator.
