ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 44860: /trunk/ /trunk/asn1/camel/: c

From: Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:40:07 -0400
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> darkjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=44860
>>
>> User: darkjames
>> Date: 2012/09/10 02:40 PM
>>
>> Log:
>>  Initial commit to support yet another method of passing data between
>> dissectors.
>>   Add new parameter 'data' to heur_dissector_t and new_dissector_t, for
>> now it's always NULL
>
>
> Does anybody have an idea of how to handle this in custom dissectors which
> need to be compiled in both 1.8 and trunk (without branching said
> dissectors--something I really would like to avoid)?
>
> I'm contemplating putting a macro in packet.h like
> DISSECTORS_HAVE_DATA_PARAM and adding the appropriate #ifdef/#else logic in
> my custom dissectors.  Any objections?  Any better ideas?

I filed something similar as a bug long before I was a core dev:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6134

I still don't know enough about the build system to feel comfortable
fixing it myself once and for all (especially given the mix of
autotools, cmake, nmake) but I still think that a general version
macro would be a much better way than manually adding a macro for
every API change.