Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?

Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_lis

From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 04:39:58 +0200

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:11:54PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> Yes.
> 
> The routines should probably be renamed as well.

Done both (r44764 and r44765).

  Ciao
    Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?
  - From: Joerg Mayer
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?
  - From: Guy Harris

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] DND crash through all versions?
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Removing string constants from assertions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube