Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2794] Questionable display filter fiel
From: Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:54:33 +0200
Should we update the release notes if the first field of a protocol filter changes?
In this particular example I've noticed two while looking at about 5 protocols
(pap -> prap, ntpptiv -> ntp.priv).

Ciao
     Jörg

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 08:15:43PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2794
> 
> Michael Mann <[email protected]> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Attachment #6362|review_for_checkin?         |review_for_checkin-
>               Flags|                            |
> 
> --- Comment #32 from Michael Mann <[email protected]> 2012-07-21 20:15:42 PDT ---
> Comment on attachment 6362
>   --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6362
> Fixing some more of the simpler "questionable" display filters
> 
> checked in different version of a comparible path to revision 43907
> 
> -- 
> Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug.
> You are watching all bug changes.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
>              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.