Evan Huus wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
[...]
ASCII has no byte-order issues, and the convention is that ENC_NA is
used to explicitly indicate that the byte order is not applicable.
But, as above, we already get that from the fact that it's ASCII in the
first place. If the agreed style is to be explicit in these cases,
that's fine, but then that should be made clearer in the comments.
(As an aside, I'm assuming based on this that the few places which do
'ENC_ASCII | ENC_BIG_ENDIAN' or 'ENC_ASCII | ENC_LITTLE_ENDIAN' are
actually wrong?)
Sounds wrong to me given this discussion; I removed all those places in
r42297.
