Hi,
I think there is two paths that can be taken either add options and/or
blocks as needed to the file format or
encode the comment in some way, using the preferences simple format is
one option.
I'm leaning towards using the comments somehow. One could have Wireshark
begin/end tags for
other programs to skip that part of the comments.
Regards
Anders
Tyson Key skrev 2012-03-05 19:39:
Hi Bill,
I don't know if the format's developers ever contemplated that use
case - although they designed it to be fairly extensible, and I'm sure
that someone could design a new type of block that stores serialised
application preferences (in compressed XML, JSON, or some other
format?), after requesting an type ID for it.
I haven't thought too much about how you'd actually go about deciding
upon the preferences to store - although adding a universal "Save
Current Preferences" option to the file saving dialogue, and having an
option in the corresponding file opening dialogue to temporarily
import/set those preferences might work.
I'm sure that others will come up with better ideas, though...
Tyson.
On 5 March 2012 18:26, Bill Meier<wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Would it make any sense to be able to store "application specific"
information in a pcapng file ?
E.g., selected Wireshark prefs so that Wireshark can act on same ?
This would be useful when a capture file reqires specific dissector
preferences to properly dissect the file.
Would this fit (at all) within the design goals for pcapng ?
Is there be a way to do this reasonably cleanly with the existing format ?
How might one indicate the prefs which should to be stored ?
....
Bill
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
