Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building plugins for both win32 & win64

From: Teto <mattator@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:12:20 +0100
ok, that worked for me (installing source twice). This is not a
demanding solution yet having a single folder would be more efficient.

Thx

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:46 PM, <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Yea, I've had to do a "distclean" when switching between the two "platforms" since they share common folders (and thus object files).  Alan's methodology of installing the source twice and keeping both "platforms" separate is probably the only way to avoid the "distclean" and why there's the suggestion of keeping object file folders "platform specfic" when switching/upgrading to powershell or msbuild.
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: mattator <mattator@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Developer support list for Wireshark' <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thu, Jan 19, 2012 12:41 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building plugins for both win32 & win64
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Teto
> > Sent: 19 January 2012 17:17
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building plugins for both win32 & win64
> >
> > I am very eager to know the answer since I am currently fighting to build
> > both.
> > I don't know how I did it but in fact, I 've got 2 folders:
> > -wireshark-win32-lib
> > -wireshark-win64-lib
> >
> > I think I have built correctly all libs in the 2 directories, but whenever I
> try
>
> There's not much building, mostly downloading.  It is best to keep them separate
> though.
>
> > compiling wireshark in 32 bits (set
> > WIRESHARK_TARGET_PLATFORM=win32 within a x86 visual command
> > prompt), I've got this error:
> >
> > "inffas32.obj : fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'X86'
> > conflicts with target machine type 'x64'"
> >
>
> Have you done a 'nmake -f Makefile.nmake clean' when switching between build
> types?  Check after this that there are no object files left lying around 'dir
> /s *.obj' and delete them if there are.  As the builds are done in-tree if you
> don't clean all the previous types object files out they will cause issues with
> the build of the current type.
>
> > I've got no pb compiling into 64bits. (I call vcvars64bits,set
> > WIRESHARK_TARGET_PLATFORM=win64).
> >
> > any help/doc on this could be useful.
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Weir, Alan <AWeir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
> > > Am I correct in saying that in order to build a plugin for both win32
> > > and
> > > win64 that I have to install the source twice and build each version.
> > > Then copy my plugin into each source tree and build the two executables.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If so, then, with the recent discussions regarding moving to
> > > powershell and or msbuild would it be possible to direct the built
> > > files into target specific subfolders (i.e win32 and win64) in the
> > > same way that Visual Studio does. In that way the source only needs to
> > > be installed once and the two targets can be built side be side.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe