Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports

Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:45:42 -0800

On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Krishnamurthy Mayya wrote:

> Thanks a lot Harris.Now i have submitted a single bug ( Bug 6610 in bugzilla) with all the required attachments and marked the previous bugs as duplicate which are no longer need to be referred. This would be fine right??

Yes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports
  - From: Francesco Fondelli

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports
  - From: Krishnamurthy Mayya
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports
  - From: Krishnamurthy Mayya

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports
Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] What is the best way to create a stateful dissector?
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Linked bug reports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube