> From: Helge Kruse <Helge.Kruse-nospam@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:29:47 +0200
>
> Am 19.07.2011 14:23, schrieb Davide Milanesio:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to make a Wireshark Installer from the latest development
> release (1.7.0), according to Section 2.2.13 of Wireshark Developer's
> Guide.
> Compiling and testing on Win XP.
>
> Unfortunately, after the source is correctly compiled and also the
> installer is generated,
> if such installer is launched, after the installation process the new
> .exe files are not working
> (the message -translated from Italian- is: "Application not correctly
> initialised (0x0c150002)")
>
> Instead, following the same procedure from release 1.5.0 was successful.
>
> Any hint? ;-)
>
> Looks at least at a typo with the code:
>
> 0x0c150002 = Sev_Success + Fac_0x0C15 + Code_0x0002
> 0xc0150002 = Sev_Error + Fac_0x0015 + Code_0x0002
>
> 0x0015 = 37 = FACILITY_DIRECTORYSERVICE
> 0x0002 = 2 = ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND
>
>
> The last recent problem I faced with this code was that the runtime was not available in the > correct version. Did you test the installer on the development machine?
>
> You can check, which versions of the runtime libraries are in the WinSxS directories and which version your executables (wireshark.exe, any load-time-DLL) requires. I have seen that a Windows update installed new versions of the runtime in Visual Studio as a bugfix.
>
> I am uncertain where the installer grabs the runtime libraries that must be installed on the target machine. Probably this must be fixed.
>
> Helge
Thanks, got it!!
The issue is in zlib1.dll.
In fact, on the development machine there are two different zlib1.dll,
both of them with version 1.2.5.0 but with different size:
- zlib1.dll under C:\wireshark\wireshark-gtk2 (same in
C:\wireshark-win32-libs\zlib125): 67,584 byte [btw, it is the same
zlib1.dll belonging to the Stable Release 1.6.1)
- zlib1.dll under C:\wireshark-win32-libs\gtk2\bin: 100,352 byte
The installer uses the first one (67,584 byte), but it is wrong.
Manually copying the second one (100,352 byte) on the target PC, it
works properly!
I agree that this should be fixed.
-- Davide
