Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:
> What exactly do people want with those byte counts?
I don't presume to know what one might want to use that data for. I am merely
trying to report the most meaningful information possible.
> ...which means that you can't get a link-layer byte count that pertains to
what was actually sent out over
> any network link.
It was just an example. I have similar Ethernet captures, so substitute a 14
byte Ethernet header for a 16-byte Linuxed cooked capture. The point and
question remains. What is the most accurate/desirable/expected number to report?
