Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio

From: Stephen Fisher <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:23:33 -0600
The Windows buildbots are complaining about this change and I don't know 
why.  I don't have a Windows build to test on, but on Unix it doesn't 
compain (gcc) even if I add -Wsign-compare.

>From (only relevant portions shown):

   guint8 num_subrects, subrect_len;
   guint bytes_needed;
   bytes_needed = subrect_len * num_subrects;
   VNC_BYTES_NEEDED(bytes_needed);

To:

   guint8 num_subrects, subrect_len;
   VNC_BYTES_NEEDED(subrect_len * num_subrects);

Where VNC_BYTES_NEEDED is a macro:

   #define VNC_BYTES_NEEDED(a)                                     \
           if(a > (guint)tvb_length_remaining(tvb, *offset))       \
                   return a;

The compiler warning:

packet-vnc.c(1970) : warning C4018: '>' : signed/unsigned mismatch

Any ideas?

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 02:21:27PM -0700, buildbot-no-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis on Wireshark (development).
> Full details are available at:
>  http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis/builds/289
> 
> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/
> 
> Buildslave for this Build: vs-code-analysis
> 
> Build Reason: 
> Build Source Stamp: 36386
> Blamelist: sfisher
> 
> BUILD FAILED: failed nmake all
> 
> sincerely,
>  -The Buildbot
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe