Hello Bill, Guy,
Thus wrote Martin Kaiser (lists@xxxxxxxxx):
> Thus wrote Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> > > 2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual
> > > data.
> > > I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just
> > > part
> > > of the captured data (similar to the code in your original patch).
> > > This is the approach used by packet-radiotap.c
> > At this point, I prefer the second approach. The Linux USB dissector
> > now uses that, as of revision 32534; switching to that cleaned things
> > up.
> thanks for the feedback. I'll define the pseudo-header for DVB-CI, apply
> for a DLT and modify my dissector accordingly.
I uploaded a new version of the dvb-ci dissector to the bugtracker a
week ago, fixing the issues you found when reviewing the code. Before
that, I requested a DLT at the tcpdump workers list. Unfortunately,
there's been no response yet. Any chance you can have a look and help me
progress this? (Guy, are you assigning the DLT values?)
Thanks,
Martin
