On 7 feb 2011, at 19:46, Guy Harris wrote:
> Unless the NASA guys who contributed the packet-ccsds.c and packet-vcdu.c dissectors would like to argue that, in their dissection, a 0-origin day-of-year works better, in which case we should support both 0-origin and 1-origin display formats, I would suggest switching to a 1-origin display format and see whether we get a complaint from any space data people (in which case we should add a separate 0-origin format).
I like the practical trial-and-complaint approach. If we do get a complaint, I would suggest a preference for choosing 1-origin or 0-origin instead of displaying both.
Cheers,
Sake
