Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..()

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

 -1.

It adds bloat to the API, adding noting really.

Thanks,
Jaap

On 01/12/2011 08:51 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> Wouldn't it be handy to have a proto_tree_new_item_get_val_ which would
> return the value
> thus avoiding to having do tvb_get_.. in conjunction with
> proto_tree_new_item() when the value
> is needed in a dissector?
>
> Would an function per field type be necessary? like
> proto_tree_new_item_get_val_int32, proto_tree_new_item_get_val_uint32
> etc or is there a smarter way of doing it?
>
> Any one interested in implementing it?
> Regards
> Anders