Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different

From: Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:26:54 +0000 (UTC)

Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:

>SHOULD in some RFC - or even a MUST - but I don't know offhand what RFC that is)

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
  - From: Guy Harris

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
  - From: eymanm
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
  - From: Stephen Fisher
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
  - From: Stephen Fisher
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
  - From: Christopher Maynard
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
  - From: Guy Harris