Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] fragment_add_..(), pinfo->src/dst, IP vs. TCP Session
From: David Aggeler <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:56:04 +0200
I'll probably will create a unique ID for this dissector, but is there 
any desire to handle this in reassemble.c, so other TCP based dissectors 
don't need to reinvent this?
Specially because fragment_hash() already ignores the addresses, I'm 
wondering about the direction of the reassemble module.

Am 11.07.2010 18:24, schrieb Bill Meier:
A suggestion (if you haven't already decided what to do):
Store a (unique) value with the TCP conversation on which the PDV
occurs; Use this as the id to fragment_add....

The unique value could be the same as what tcp_dissect_pdus uses: the
frame number of the first frame containing the PDV.

Or: Use whatever makes sense for you for the unique id....


Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list<[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
              mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe