ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Pidl patch for ABSOLUTE_TIMEs

From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:55:23 -0400
Well, I'm not sure that Samba (the list to whom that mail was sent)
has a bugzilla or not.  (Wireshark-dev was just in Cc: so the
Wireshark developers would know that I know that I modified a
Pidl-generated file and was attempting to send the patch upstream to
where Pidl is maintained.)

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Maynard, Chris
<Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Maybe it would be better to open a new bug for this so it's not forgotten about?  And maybe the Pidl Wiki page should be updated to indicate that patches should be submitted via bugzilla instead?  Or not.  I just know that the core developers don't always have the time to review and commit the patches right away so if it's filed with bugzilla, then it won't be lost or forgotten.
> - Chris
> ________________________________________
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss [jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:07 PM
> To: samba-technical@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Pidl patch for ABSOLUTE_TIMEs
>
> Hello,
>
> The Wireshark Wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Pidl
>
> says to send patches against Pidl to this address.
>
> Pidl generates some Wireshark dissector fields of type
> FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME.  Starting some time not too long ago, these fields
> need a 'display' field other than BASE_NONE or BASE_DEC.  The attached
> patch fixes this, *assuming* that all the times are "local."  Other
> options include:
>
>        ABSOLUTE_TIME_UTC,      /* UTC, with month and day */
>        ABSOLUTE_TIME_DOY_UTC   /* UTC, with 1-origin day-of-year */
>
> For now (to keep Wireshark running) I've modified the dcerpc-lsa
> dissector manually; this is my attempt to push the patch upstream.
>
> Regards,
> -Jeff
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
> and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
> email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and
> notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
> forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>