Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??

From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:50:55 +0100

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:09:19AM +1100, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> You also shouldnt hardcode the size of the array in the for loop like
> that,   use something like      sizeof[ports] / sizeof(ports[0])
> instead.

Or better use wireshark array_length() macro.

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
  - From: Brian Oleksa
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
  - From: Brian Oleksa
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
  - From: wsgd
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
  - From: Brian Oleksa
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
  - From: ronnie sahlberg

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Capture -> Options forces reprocessing ofall packets
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark decode as..??
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Capture -> Options forces reprocessing of all packets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread