Hi,
That would probably be #1.
This option makes verification against a protocol spec / RFC easiest,
also such values don't have to be sequential.
Thanks,
Jaap
Send from my iPhone
On 14 feb 2010, at 22:21, Kaul <mykaul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Which one is better?
option 1:
#define SSL_HND_HELLO_REQUEST 0
#define SSL_HND_CLIENT_HELLO 1
...
or perhaps, option 2:
enum {
SSL_HND_HELLO_REQUEST,
SSL_HND_CLIENT_HELLO,
};
...
and then (in both cases):
const value_string ssl_31_handshake_type[] = {
{ SSL_HND_HELLO_REQUEST, "Hello Request" },
{ SSL_HND_CLIENT_HELLO, "Client Hello" },
?
TIA,
Y.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
