Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking?
From: "Maynard, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:46:54 -0500
Here's one that's not yet supported:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200805/msg00058.html
I've never had the time to work on it and likely never will at this
point.
 
- Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Ludemann
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Suggestions for dissectors in need of
reworking?

Hi!

Are there any dissectors that are in any particular need of re-writing
or re-working? I've been working on a higher level protocol
specification format (http://www.protocollogic.com/), and would like
to try it out with some more protocols (with the possibility that the
resultant decoder may be put to use, instead of just as a logical
exercise).

I've used it to (partially) decode several formats, some binary (jpeg,
pdf, ber asn.1), some text based (that are highly structured). The
constructs are loosely based on ASN.1.

Protocol suggestions & flames welcome!

Cheers,
Henry
________________________________________________________________________
___
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
 
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and 
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.