Hi,
Yes, because these are real bugs.
Thanx,
Jaap
Send from my iPhone
On 27 sep 2009, at 21:50, didier <dgautheron@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Le vendredi 25 septembre 2009 à 14:30 -0700, Guy Harris a écrit :
On Aug 14, 2009, at 11:38 PM, krj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=29427
User: krj
Date: 2009/08/14 11:38 PM
Log:
This patch introduces packet_add_new_data_source() which effectively
deprecates add_new_data_source(). This is based on the following
observation:
1) The tvb + name (aka. data_source) is only used when the protocol
tree is visible
Nope. It's also used, for example, by "tshark -x", even if "-V"
isn't
specified. There may be other places where it's used as well.
Hum, does it means that all dissectors using
if (tree) {...; call_dissector(data_handle,...) }
Have to be modified?
Didier
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
