Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] behavior of tcp_dissect_pdus when protocol pdu is across tcp
From: Sudarshan Raghavan <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:25:16 +0530
Thanks for the responses. My initial analysis was wrong. The problem
was due to 'lost TCP segments'. These are segments that wireshark
failed to capture and I can see an ack for these packets from the
client and I don't see retransmissions either. Due to this the
dissection of RTMP fails badly.  RTMP is a very context sensitive
protocol. Missing any one chunk offset will have a cascading effect
from thereon.

I am currently trying with 'TCP analyze sequence numbers' disabled. A
quick search on google also seems to suggest this might not help a
lot. I found this mail from the archives
. Does anyone know of any way to workaround this problem?


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Guy Harris<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Sudarshan Raghavan wrote:
>> How do I make tcp_dissect_pdus work correctly with chunks across TCP
>> segments.
> Is it not working correctly now?  I've seen it work correctly for
> other protocols, even with multiple messages within one TCP segment,
> messages split across TCP segments, and messages split across TCP
> segments with the last TCP segment having the end of one message
> followed by other messages or the beginning of another message.
> Note that "working correctly" does not mean "calling your dissector
> with a non-zero offset", it means "calling your chunk dissector with a
> completely reassembled RTMP chunk, even if the chunk is split across
> TCP segment boundaries or if there are parts of more than one RTMP
> chunk (or complete RTMP chunks) in a TCP segment".
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe