ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 29418: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/:new_p

From: "Anders Broman" <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:26:46 +0200
Hi,
new_packet_list_get_record() will be less hacky if all colums are of type 
G_TYPE_POINTER and we always retrieve "record" and then extract the data we
want.
Regards
Anders


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För krj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Skickat: den 14 augusti 2009 20:59
Till: wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ämne: [Wireshark-commits] rev 29418: /trunk/gtk/
/trunk/gtk/:new_packet_list.c

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=29418

User: krj
Date: 2009/08/14 11:59 AM

Log:
 Remove the hacky row_from_iter() function and use
new_packet_list_get_record() instead. Alas, new_packet_list_get_record() is
also somewhat hacky in its nature, but hey at least we're using one less
hacky thing.

Directory: /trunk/gtk/
  Changes    Path                 Action
  +5 -17     new_packet_list.c    Modified

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list
<wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
 
mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe